The last entry was of course devoted to why the NFL is better than college football. In fairness, now it's time to evaluate why college football is better than the NFL.
1. Fan loyalty. This isn't a slight against the loyalty of NFL fans, but you would be hard-pressed to find fan bases that are more loyal than your average college football fan base. The NFL has some crazy fans (Hogettes, anyone?), but the fan bases in college football are some of the most backwardly loyal people on the planet; they will blindly follow those teams off a cliff if their head coach is charismatic enough (see Weis, Charlie). Logically speaking, it makes sense that college football would have more loyalty as well; the alumni of that university are more likely to have stronger feelings for their team because they feel like they are a part of it. Unless you're one in a couple hundred thousand, I strongly doubt you'll ever have that kind of a connection with an NFL franchise.
2. Emotion. Loyalty also breeds rivalry, something that you don't see enough of in the NFL. When an Auburn fan encounters an Alabama fan, usually it goes beyond a few crude insults; can't really say the same thing for some of the NFL's biggest rivalries. Fan bases genuinely hate each other, and aren't afraid to say it (or demonstrate it, as the case sometimes may be). That emotion translates into attendance, and when you have over 100,000 people screaming at you in Happy Valley or Neyland Stadium, you tend to notice the electricity in the air. There's also something about college football that seems more pure; you don't have the bargaining agreements or salary disputes with college players because, well...they don't have a salary (and don't give me that corruption bullshit...that is NOT the norm in college athletics). A lot of these players won't make it to the NFL, and they're playing football because they love to play, not playing for the money. Hard to make that argument when you've got players who haven't even played a down for an NFL team arguing with front office personnel about signing bonuses and escalator clauses.
3. The parity. Arguably the greatest thing - and in some cases, the worst thing - about college football is how level the playing field is. Recent NCAA regulations that limited the number of scholarships available for NCAA teams has allowed a greater proliferation of talent to some of the non-BCS schools (most notably Utah, BYU, TCU, and Boise State) and greatly equalized the amount of talent on each team. Upsets are the norm now - Appalachian State over Michigan, Navy over Notre Dame, Stanford over USC...all the result of the phenomenon that is college football, where anyone can beat just about anyone. The NFL has free agency, and college football has upsets - that's just the way it is.
4. The playbooks. Though the NFL does not reject innovation, it definitely has a hard time embracing it. A lot of that has to do with the elite athletes on both sides of the ball, but occasionally a scheme will come along (West Coast Offense, for one) that changes the way NFL football is played. However, in college, those elite athletes are juxtaposed against each other in a variety of exotic and creative schemes every single Saturday, and new trends are created seemingly each week as teams attempt to exploit their opponents' major weaknesses. The "Wildcat" formation is en vogue right now in the NFL...but its origins were in college football. The triple option, the spread formation, the 3-3-5 defense, the Maryland I-formation...all collegiate ideas implemented on the collegiate gridiron. When is the last time any NFL coach had a really good idea that changed the way the game is played? It happens every day in college.
So now that both arguments have been laid out, I guess a decision can be reached. So next time I'll tell you which one I think is better: the NFL or college football.